testnet
—
—
—
—
—
Authority
Activity
—
These are not settings. They are in the script that unlocks the coin, and the network checks them on every spend — including the one that is crossed out.
The question this answers
Every grant on this site was issued by a person signing once. This one was not. Agent #003 subdivided its own grant and handed a bounded piece of its authority to a sub-agent holding a different key — no principal online, no new funding, and nothing the parent could not already do.
The covenant permits that in one direction only. Every limit may shrink and none may grow, and the child commits to a node of its parent’s recipients tree rather than to a list of its own — so it proves, on every spend, that whoever it is paying was someone its parent could have paid. A shorter window ends by itself and a smaller budget bounds the damage; narrowing the allowlist is the attenuation with teeth.
And it is not one-way. What the child does not spend settles back into the parent’s budget — to the agent that was mid-task, not to the human who funded it.
—
—
created may first spend
Who it pays
A name over an address is a claim about identity, and an ordinary address makes it unfalsifiable — it is whoever we say it is. So each name below is re-derived on every run from a published artefact, and one that stops matching is dropped: the address is then shown without a name, which is worse to read and far better than a name that is wrong.
Its lineage
A Warda grant’s terms cannot be edited. Replacing what an agent may spend therefore means ending one grant and starting another — and the grant that ends does not get a say in it, because the key that ends it is not the agent’s.
Its lineage
This grant was not issued by a person. Another grant subdivided itself and handed over a bounded piece of its own authority — which the covenant permits only in one direction. Each figure below is parent → child.
Its authority
Its limits
Every sentence below is produced by running the same function the payer runs before it builds a transaction — against this grant, with these numbers. None of them is copy. If the grant’s limits changed, these would change with them, or the page would not build.
Its work
Refusals included. A purchase log that records only the successes is a sales brochure.
Honesty
Agent #001’s second grant paid a third-party vendor 1.47 KAS for a service that never arrived. That is on its page, with the transaction id, for the same reason this column is here: the covenant bounds what a vendor who takes payment without delivering can take, and it does not do anything else.
Check it
Every field below is on the chain. Nothing here needs to be believed.
Reproduce the purchase yourself:
git clone https://github.com/ArtyKOMarkets/warda && cd warda/agent-002 source ../ops/node.env WARDA_SK=$(cat ../covenant/deploy/agent-002.key) \ node --experimental-strip-types tools/buy.ts \ https://warda-demo-api.vercel.app/digest
The key is not in the repository, so that command will pay from your grant, not ours. agent-002/README.md has the three commands that mint one.